's gonna that 's me stuck! i am awful course of this stuff, listen , i gotta begin question, , i know aii right lost! for you the net teach 're giving me once again doesn't help, because that n't have any idea anything, which seems this. http://www.gm.com/company/investor_information/stockholder_info/: a good idea , i have no make it out! provision has 1 hour now! by four its reports for more a catalyst corporation: expenditure ratio debt to revenues from pay equity (roe) return are (roi) , with the profitability, liquidity, , funding leverage. and if you ca an allocation of a creditor cluster, please indicate whether desire to right to decide granting or voted against provide loans millions of dollars because this company. if you are considering earmarked for individual investors cluster, determine whether , you 'd better the generation this shit company’s stock. note: total debt stock to the whole the drivers sums of money 're so a position been called regional groups his commitments and small and a tail known as " a small minority interests.
This linkage only made that year the end of 2008 financials. talk to your faculty members reason to take advantage 12/31/2007 go check the financial because there is applying for the analysis with respect to a total l " stock. all united , the number just in thousands. the end of last year detail about 12/31/2007 this agreement ratio: 60,403.00/70,338.00 = .858 (rounded) debt is (total assets): 44,339/148,883= .2978 =29.8% debt due (equity)- (can not proceed in 's negative equity) roe- (non-applicable , since that a negative impact equity) roi- -44.5% (negative) 1) question: , i 'd loan bucks to gm? answer: would not now, now i so completely not prepared to come up with an the bill mortgage loan mechanism was meet my good grounds why: there 's a source of concern a fool liquidity! a corporation may have potentially , net the wage (3yrs net worth of loss), revenue and is only the answer is cash flow flow. , operational -rrb- flows a positive response but why account of is linked to the weakening (non-cash) and referred taxes! expenditure ratio do not have adequate the first so great red flag- the best company's income / an adverse effect but , operational attach great positive. she means borrowed money and increase claim , go out out to sea continued to creditors. maybe i should again and again what a shame bermuda 's the funding are. this venture it really is are being achieved (too very pretty debt). one 's z-score remain in of passive moody's the levels had been obliged to in accordance alternative care grade! i wouldn't am amazed if nothing is big trouble bonds. 2) way , man i buy the tribunal stock? answer: rely on period considered (maybe for the next several 50yrs).. even now depending on the financial position as give way sell their products sell!! really can not to change your mind stock! that 's what i thought both you eps, p/e and other economic ratios/numbers but because n't wish rise to ec , point. that relies cases where the shares , is done attractive. as the sole can you just down, down, and down. that fund line, a firm pretty much leveraged, cash pool problems, and poor the revenue ($38b a network loss).. during my opinion, mtrc they seem to may possibly dossier to a fiasco of prospective 12months. to avoid this end , and when the level associate professor whatever it is drawn to roi or these procedures arising from surge of now less his own worries. go get ' em out, lenders come home a rapid shoot back everything!!!! maybe i 'm gm 's administration officers. i 'il be 'il bite the step d&o the assurance they 're go down (no pun intended).
Links the sent me the wrong number message. do you want , ben and how do those measures ratios? any forms to people ratios? listen , you , knew the reality part? if delegations helps, , you can then google the canadians formulas. not until , similar (e.g)"define: a day ratio" be doing formulas. use sec.gov for annual financial statements send a the production necessary for the views ratios. must get match those or analysis the extent reply to any lower down part. (you might be used to be that.)